Statement to the Press by Fr.
Frank Pavone, National Director of Priests for Life
Press Conference, September 23, 2004
National Press Club, Washington, DC
Good morning and thank you for coming.
Though I am obviously a Catholic priest, I am not here today to talk about
Catholic doctrine.
I'm here instead to talk about the single most destructive act of violence in
our land, which is abortion. I'm here to talk about America, and the vision of
liberty that inspired her from the beginning, a liberty that is real only when
life itself is secure. I'm here to talk about those who hold and seek public
office, and the complete contradiction between being a public servant and
allowing an entire segment of the public to be destroyed. And I am joined by
people of various religious faiths and of no faith, and of various ethnic and
political backgrounds, all gathered to echo the same message.
As we approach our national elections, the single most critical issue on
which candidates should be evaluated is their stand on abortion, because that
stand is about much more than whether a medical procedure should be legal. That
stand is about what kind of government we are. There are ultimately only two
forms of government: a) That which holds that we have basic rights that
government cannot tamper with, starting with the right to life, and b) that
which holds that all our rights come from government, and therefore can be
modified or denied by government. Our Founders declared in the Declaration of
Independence that they were establishing the first kind of government, and that
government exists precisely to secure our rights.
The Supreme Court in its Roe vs. Wade decision legalized abortion throughout
pregnancy without denying the humanity of the unborn. By doing this, it
established a different kind of government in America. It abandoned the
principles of the Founders and broke the very foundation of civilization,
namely, that the weak are to be protected by the strong, and that no earthly
power can authorize violence against innocent human beings. The fabric of Roe
vs. Wade is the fabric of which holocausts are made.
What America will decide on November 2 is what type of government it wants to
be -- the type that claims authority over innocent human life, or the type that
recognizes that there are rights no government can tamper with, and truths no
courts can change.
Indeed, the position candidates take on abortion and on Roe vs. Wade
indicates what type of government they believe in.
If a candidate said, "I support terrorism," he could never be elected to
public office in America. Not only would citizens withhold their vote from such
a candidate, but they would not even bother to ask his positions on other
issues. Just imagine someone saying, "Sir, I disagree with you on terrorism, but
what's your health care plan?" Nobody would ask such a question. This does not
mean that health care, or any other issue, is unimportant. Rather, what it means
is that there are certain positions so radically incompatible with public
service that they obviously exclude the person in question from that role.
As with terrorism, so with abortion. The reason so many miss the equivalence
is that the American people have for the most part still not seen the abortion
procedure or heard it described. Yet only a few months ago, various types of
legal abortion procedures were in fact described under oath by those who perform
and witness them. Court trials regarding the ban on partial-birth abortion were
conducted in New York, in Lincoln, NE and in San Francisco. The transcripts are
available at www.priestsforlife.org among other places.
One of the other procedures described in those transcripts is the Dilatation
and Evacuation (D and E) procedure, which is fully legal in America and is one
of the most common methods of abortion in the second trimester. There are
approximately 159,000 legal second-trimester abortions a year in the United
States, and thanks to Roe vs. Wade, individual states cannot even ban this
procedure if they wanted to.
Following is an excerpt from the New York trial, on March 31 of this year,
questioning Dr. Timothy Johnson about the D and E procedure:
THE COURT: What did they utilize to crush the
head?
THE WITNESS: An instrument, a large pair of forceps that have a round,
serrated edge at the
end of it, so that they were able to bring them together and crush the head
between the ends of
the instrument.
THE COURT: Like the cracker they use to crack a lobster shell, serrated edge?
THE WITNESS: No.
THE COURT: Describe it for me.
THE WITNESS: It would be like the end of tongs that are combined that you use
to pick up
salad….
THE COURT: Except here you are crushing the head of a baby.
THE WITNESS: Correct.
The moral evil of abortion and the moral evil of terrorism are
identical. The evil of September 11, 2001, was not simply that buildings
fell and lives were lost. An earthquake could have caused the same tragic
loss. But what constituted the evil of that day was that some people had no
regard for the claims of innocent human life, but rather deliberately
destroyed them. What difference does it make if you use forceps or
commercial airplanes? What difference does it make if the victim is five
inches long or five feet tall?
No person who advocates acts of terrorism is worthy of public office, and no
person who advocates the continued legality of abortion is worthy of public
office.
To those who seek public office and describe themselves as "pro-choice," my
challenge is simple: describe the choice. Tell us whether the
abortion procedure you want to keep legal is the same as what these court
transcripts describe. And if it is too terrible to describe, why is it not too
terrible to permit?
We at Priests for Life have been involved in an intense campaign to register
and educate voters over the last several years. Today we announce the final six
weeks of that campaign, in which we will spend a million dollars to mobilize
those voters to actually go to the polls. This plan uses media and the Churches
to recruit local volunteers and foster grassroots activism. The elements of the
plan are described in your packet. We commend and thank the many groups
represented here for the activity that they are also undertaking to restore
protection to the most defenseless human beings.
All of us stand together to affirm that we who oppose abortion do not oppose
those who have abortions. Rather we stand ready to bring them support,
forgiveness, and healing. We are also ready to provide alternatives to abortion
and assistance to those who are pregnant and in need.
And we call upon all voters to advance the culture of life by their vote on
November 2. America prides herself on religious liberty. America also takes
equal pride in the defense of life, and in the recognition that there can be no
liberty without life. May this great nation never lose that pride.
Thank you.